heritage foundation

• Question:-Is the Heritage Foundation the new rightwing source for data and statistics?
  I notice every Republican always quoting the Heritage Foundation like it's legitimate when it's not. I don't think they should be considered a legitimate "thinktank".
  
  Answer:-Hardly new. They've been using them to spread propaganda disguiesed as statistics since Reagan's time.
• Question:-What is the relationship between the Heritage Foundation and the United Nations?
  What is the relationship between the heritage foundation and America?
  What is the relationship between the heritage foundation and the governments it interacts with?
  
  Answer:-none....at best...enemies.arm chair goddess,join the tea party and make a difference to save your family and country...being a useful fool is not cool.
• Question:-Has anyone set up a non-profit under the National Heritage Foundation?
  I would like to hear from some individuals or organizations that have some experience of setting up a non-donor advised Foundation under the National Heritage Foundation and under the jurisdiction of of CDF(Congressional District Programs) and under (NHF). Has anyone ever set up a Foundation under them? what did or do you like or dislike?
  
  Answer:-Check with NHF again, as there has been a rule change. Now you have to get your 501(c)(3) tax-deductible status to get money out of them. In the old days, when they could provide the 501(c)(3), it was a good deal, but not anymore. Now, your best bet is to find a local charity that will serve as your fiscal sponsor, if you don't want to go through the paperwork yourself.
• Question:-Is the Heritage Foundation a bunch of bleeding heart liberals?
  David John of the Heritage Foundation (http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/j/david-john) just destroyed Rick Perry's assertion that Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme.
  
  What does it say about the modern GOP when they make the Heritage Foundation look liberal?
  David John was just on PBS and basically said Rick Perry was an idiot for saying Social Security was a Ponzi Scheme and that it was "fundamentally sound, but with some serious problems."
  
  Answer:-It is as conservative as it gets, no different than the Rand Corporation.
• Question:-Does Progressive movement have a Think Tank like the Conservatives have the Heritage Foundation?
  I never knew that the Heritage Foundation was a Conservative think tank until my Economics professors in college encouraged me to start using their statistics for researches, which makes me wonder if there is anything out there for the Progressive movement, so I can cross check the research stats with?
  
  http://heritage.org/
  
  Answer:-Yes, the PPI and the NDN
  
  
  *Progressive Policy Institute / New Democratic Network
• Question:-Who is more reliable Heritage foundation or a bum on the side of the road?
  Heritage is garbage, I see some cons post links from them, but honestly they are 100% funded by special interest. They are PAID to say whatever the client wants them to say.
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-What ever happened to the HERITAGE FOUNDATION: Did the members started enjoying men to men activities?
  and started barking in Hebrew, too?
  
  Heritage's stated mission is to "formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense."[3]
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Is the Heritage Foundation part of the Neocon establishment?
  It seems many of their members from the top on down find papers and ways to support every action administration has pushed through.
  They are the largest backers of the President having Unitary powers.
  When it comes to heritiage if one looks at family trees and support groups then one can see their ideas of heritage.
  From debates on CNN whereby they have moderator and stacked deck against oppostion to the way they get their friends books,State Dept. papers published and get friendly educators postions on colleges.
  This is a case of tax free orgs whose members and staff make huge salarys while writng papers in favor of corporate decisions owed to thier Corporate benfactors.
  They help write the papers to get around legalitys of spying upon mail, the right to use torture so US can police world and support every administrations appointments. Mainly because they are one and the same incestual elitist group who want to rewrite Americas heritage in their own image.
  
  Answer:-Actually, that would be the American Enterprise Institute--which is tied strongly to the Neoconservative movement.
• Question:-What does the Heritage Foundation state about supporting the individual mandate?
  to buy health insurance? Do they now say they were kidding, or do they still support the mandate?
  
  Answer:-They don't speak about it at all....like it never happened. John McCain also fully supported the individual mandate....and, of course, now thinks it's socialism.
• Question:-Is The Heritage Foundation a good website for illegal immigration information?
  I ran accross this the other day, but it's hard to believe just anybody on the internet.
  
  Answer:-NO. They are a right-winged Conservative website who's claims on illeglas have been debunked many times, especially in the bogus email that claims that illegals cost us billions. I really think that their journalist "Robert Rector" has something up his sleeve.
  =====================
  
  Cost of Illegal Immigrants
  
  Q: Do illegal immigrants cost $338.3 billion dollars a year? More than the Iraq war?
  
  A: A chain e-mail that makes this claim is loaded with errors and misleading assertions. Published studies vary widely but put the cost to government at a small fraction of that total.

herman cain accuser

• Question:-Herman Cain's accuser want to talk, good or bad idea?
  According to CNN, Herman Cain's accuser want to talk. Will Cain drop out or what do you think?
  
  Answer:-She can't. The settlement was between the Restaurant Association and the accuser. Cain has no right to interfere with their settlement.
  
  Remember when the accused Bush 1 of having an affair with absolutely no proof or truth.
  
  This is the Perry campaign.
• Question:-Do you think Sharon Bialek (the new Herman Cain accuser) is sexy?
  
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Did you hear that Herman Cain drown his accuser in an Oldsmobile?
  First Cain emailed a picture of his Wiener to her... her name was Client # 9
  
  Then he spooged on her dress, and said "I did not have sexual relations with that women "
  
  then he was fleeing from the cops while drunk and his car went off a bridge, and she drowned
  
  How could any political party support someone who did things like that?
  
  Oh wait - I might be confusing Cain with some democrats
  
  Answer:-Today's statement by one of the accusers says she doesn't want to go into "specifics." Rumor is that she received a couple of months salary. That would probably mean the insurance company offered her a settlement and she ran with it. It's baseless since she would have pushed for much more if it was real.
• Question:-Will the accuser of Presidential candidate Herman Cain, cash in on her fame, like Anita Hill did?
  I clearly recall Anita Hill and the legions of liberals who supported her sexual harassment charge swear, never, never, never will Anita Hill exploit the sexual harassment charge to personally profit or advance her career.
  
  Well, like everything liberals say, it was a total lie. Anita Hill has been milking her attack on Clarence Thomas, for years and years, mega-money book deals, mega-money speaking engagements and prestigious jobs that she never would have earned on her own merits.
  
  We learned from Clarence Thomas, any black person who does not acknowledge a HUGE debt to the "far left" will be disparaged, ridiculed and condemned if they do not support all the causes of the "far left".
  
  Certainly, time has proven the leadership of liberals in civil rights has digressed into absolute corruption and total failure. Liberals placed false leaders like Sharpton and Jackson, to incite racial conflict. Liberal leadership had caused people from the ghetto to commit 6x the number of crimes than any other demographic; liberal leadership has led to the majority of babies born into the ghetto are illegitimate and a tiny portion are raised by both parents. Crime, drug usage, unemployment and dependency on government is the product and effect of liberal leadership, throughout all of the ghettos in America.
  
  Rather than to raise people from the ghetto up to a higher level, liberals with their control of news media, television and movie industries worship all the negative attributes of the ghetto as ideals. Liberal controlled entertainment industry shows rappers and gangsters as the role model for poor minorities. Uneducated and ignorant "Ebonics" speaking is portrayed by liberals and Hollywood, as an example for poor minorities. None of the bad behavior of people from the ghetto who commit crime 6x any other demographic are ever held responsible by the "get even with whitey" culture created by liberals and the gangsters they support to mislead poor minorities.
  
  Liberals love whistle blowers and make movies to create "hero worship" of anyone who opposes an icon of capitalism. However, a whistle blower who tells the truth about a socialist or a leaders of the far left, will be vilified and disparaged by Hollywood and the liberal media. Matt Damon, Julia Roberts, George Clooney and Robert Redford will not do a movie glorifying Linda Tripp who collected evidence to defend herself from the tidal wave of corruption, the Clinton crime cartel dispatched on anyone who dared to expose their corruption and witness intimidation. However, the accused of Cain knows she will attain stardom if she can destroy Cain's chances to become a republican nominee for President.
  
  
  Will we see the Cain accuser cashing in on fame, fortune, book deals, appearance and being the darling of the socialist uprising?
  Adam Loves Coke- your list sounds like Barry with the exception your messiah never had a job, never ran a company, never managed people; your hero was a community activist with no business or economic background. Cain when compared to Obama has far more experience, not even close.
  
  I am not a huge fan of Cain but admire the courage it takes a black man, to tell socialists to stick their disease where the sun doesn't shine. Liberals call any black person who does not support far left political views, racist names like "house N" and "Uncle Tom" etc
  
  Cain may not be the greatest candidate, but he is a 1000x better than Obama, a totally empty suit with no clue what to do.
  Adam Loves Coke- your list sounds like Barry with the exception your messiah never had a job, never ran a company, never managed people; your hero was a community activist with no business or economic background. Cain when compared to Obama has far more experience, not even close.
  
  I am not a huge fan of Cain but admire the courage it takes a black man, to tell socialists to stick their disease where the sun doesn't shine. Liberals call any black person who does not support far left political views, racist names like "house N" and "Uncle Tom" etc
  
  Cain may not be the greatest candidate, but he is a 1000x better than Obama, a totally empty suit with no clue what to do.
  
  Answer:-I question the accuser. Today's statement says she doesn't want to go into "specifics." Allegedly she received a couple of months salary. That would probably mean the insurance company offered her a settlement and she ran with it. It's baseless since she would have pushed for much more if it was real.
  
  Indicating that they wouldn't pay her off if the allegations weren't true is wrong. Insurance companies settle since it's more expensive to fight it!
• Question:-Should Herman Cain be able to face his accuser rather than having faceless anonymous allegations thrown at him?
  
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Can Herman Cain recover after so many independent allegations of sexual harassment?
  up to three so far
  
  http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/herman-cain-accuser-will-not-go-public/
  
  Answer:-Of course he can...he is a hypocritical conservative pandering to hypocritical conservative voters.
  
  Sexual scandals are ONLY a big deal when it is a liberal caught in the scandal...when it is a liberal the conservative christians heap on nothing but condemnation...when it is one of their own caught sexually harassing women they heap on nothing but the lords forgiveness and understanding.
  
  It could come out tomorrow that Cain molested children and all he has to do is get in front of a microphone and say "I spoke to god, god forgives me and that means you have to forgive me too or go against the will of god."
• Question:-Who will believe Herman Cain's accuser if she does come forward about the Sexual Harassment Allegations?
  
  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cain-accuser-may-come-forward-to-tell-her-side-of-the-story/
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-Will Herman Cain release his accusers from their confidentiality agreement so we can get all the facts?
  The attorney of one of his accusers says she is happy to answer questions if Cain will release her from the confidentiality agreement she signed when she accepted his hush money. Do you think he will?
  
  Answer:-will she return the "hush money" and bring a case to court to try to prove her claims? he can sue her if she puts forth accusations that have not been proven.
• Question:-Herman Cain's Accuser Ready To Tell Her Story. Your thoughts? Does he survive this or drop out? If so, why?
  
  
  Answer:-
• Question:-How many former Herman Cain supporters are there in this section after today?
  http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/11/07/cain.accuser/index.html
  Groping is more than flirting.
  
  Answer:-I am sure that the Tea party members with all their values of wholesome Christian Conservatism will still back him up!!!
  
  After all what is the point of having money, power and influence if you can't abuse it???............It is possible though that like all cons, Cain thought god was looking the other way!!!
  
  How wrong he was!!!!