Monday, November 7, 2011

verdict in michael jackson trial

  • Question:-Michael Jackson/Doctor Murray trial,.. Verdict is in !?
    They will be announcing the verdict at 4:00 pm today.

    Who says it will be a guilty verdict?

    BQ: Who says It will be a not guilty verdict ? ..The charge is ''involuntary manslaughter''
    They are getting ready to announce it in moments, is what they're saying. It's on HLN. I don't know if it's California time. It's 4:00pm 3:00 central time in Kansas, that's where Im at.

    Answer:-He's been found guilty...Finally!
  • Question:-everything in michael jacksons trial?
    everything from attorneys names to verdict

    Answer:-this link will tell you all you need to know

    and he is 100%INNOCENT and I dont know how anybody could have been so cruel as to say and do what they did to him..

  • Question:-THE MICHAEL JACKSON CONSPIRACY...what do MJ haters think?
    From ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    He was the pop icon the media loved to hate. Tremendously wealthy, inarguably eccentric, and one of the most famous people in the world, Michael Jackson was the unenviable target of constant public humiliation. The media poked fun at his skin, his features, his sexuality, and his lifestyle.Here, seasoned crime reporter Aphrodite Jones condemns the media for perpetuating hateful rumors and innuendoes, recounting just the sordid details, and reporting only the most despicable accusations and grisly charges made against Michael Jackson during his criminal trial. They had built a highly profitable industry around the superstar’s “freaky life” and banked on his conviction. And, it turns out, they got it all wrong.In their efforts to make money and win ratings, the media missed the truth. It wasn’t until after the “not guilty” verdict that Jones had the insight and courage to admit her own unintentional role in the frenzy surrounding the shocking testimony, high drama, and countless celebrities in Michael Jackson’s high-profile criminal trial. Here, she makes amends with what is not only a truthful, well-documented chronicle of the entire trial but a powerful indictment against the media for conspiring to distort, dehumanize, and destroy Michael Jackson. Jones argues convincingly that the case against Jackson amounted to nothing more than a media-made, tax-paid scandal, and she makes an impassioned call to action for the public-at-large to think critically, question the integrity, and demand the truth in “the news”. Find more Michael Jackson Conspiracy reviews.

    Michael Jackson Conspiracy Review

    When District Attorney Tom Sneddon smugly announced that Michael Jackson was to be criminally charged, and that Neverland was being raided, he was so blinded by greed, jealousy and vengeance that he could not see that the degenerate family he had sided with, the Arvizo family, in order to try and take Michael Jackson’s freedom from him, and ruin his reputation, all so that Sneddon could bask in glory, would actually bring Sneddon the ultimate humiliation. Sneddon’s case against Michael Jackson was built on lies, and was created by liars, and Sneddon got exactly what he deserved, failure!!!

    When Michael Jackson was put on trial, accused of having molested Gavin Arvizo — who had learnt from his family how to extort people — the media refused to tell the truth. The media refused to acknowledge, or discuss, what was actually going on in the courtroom that was favorable to Michael Jackson. The testimony that pointed to Michael Jackson’s innocence, the success Michael Jackson’s attorneys had in exposing the prosecution case for what it was, sham, was ignored by the media, the media refused to tell the truth.

    When prosecution witnesses who desired to fill their pockets with Michael Jackson’s money, who hoped to become rich by selling false stories, who falsely accused Michael Jackson, and who made up as many lies as possible, as horrible as possible, to extort as much money as possible from Michael Jackson, were exposed, it was ignored by the media, the media refused to tell the truth.

    When the accuser, Gavin Arvizo, and his family, mother Janet Arvizo, and siblings Star Arvizo and Davellin Arvizo, stumbled over their lies, contradicted themselves continually, became argumentative when presented with facts that proved they were liars and extortionists, it was ignored by the media, the media refused to tell the truth.

    When Michael Jackson’s young cousin testified that the accuser, Gavin Arvizo, and Gavin’s brother Star tried to get him to masturbate in their presence, it was ignored by the media, the media refused to tell the truth.

    When it was revealed that Michael Jackson’s former employees only claimed to have seen inappropriate behavior by Michael Jackson AFTER THEY WERE OFFERED MONEY AND PAID BY TABLOIDS/THE MEDIA, it was ignored by the media, the media refused to tell the truth. (Michael Jackson successfully sued these former employees many years ago, they still owe him money.)

    When Michael Jackson’s current employees testified that the accuser, Gavin Arvizo, and his family slept in guesthouses at Neverland (and not in Michael Jackson’s bedroom), that they caused a great deal of trouble at Neverland, left a huge mess at Neverland, damaged and defaced property at Neverland, attacked the animals at Neverland, pulled knives on Neverland employees, stole from Neverland employees, stole from Michael Jackson, extorted Neverland employees by lying about their financial circumstances, extorted the government by lying about their financial circumstances, extorted other celebrities by lying to them and falsely accusing them, caused trouble wherever they went, and to whoever was unlucky enough to befriend them, overall having been shown to be
    i know it's long but if you wanna defend your points you must know what it talks about...
    Janel...i'm happy you didn't just criticize nehatively..i appreciate it...
    but it's impossible for me to stand injustice, i feel compelled side what i think is right...and i'm not defending the artist but the man who saved thousands of lives, who was selfless, generous and so devoted to others...i'm grateful for all what he did even though i never knew him...
    believe me, if i could free myself from him i would, but i think it's my duty to fight for what he believed..i can do nothing about it!

    for me, michael represents love generosity and peace...and when people say they hate him, i don't need to explain...

    I AM NOT ASKING EVERBODY TO LOVE HIM... of course not!this is impossible anyway, but i'm asking all those who haven't, to please see things in another way....

    so please don't say that i'm biased or that i'm kind of worshipping him
    oh hurts so badly when you have people saying bad things on michael...
    each time i have to look at the answers i receive i'm a bit hesitant because i know somebody trashing michael will hurt hurts even more when you have his actual fans insulting you!
    what do you want me to do???go back into time and take birth earlier????f i could i you all think that i'm happy that i missed michael??isn't that thought enough? without having other fans coming forward and treating of being a hypocrite???
    what did i say wrong that you, "i love MJ" had to tell me all this??i said that before i didn't exclude the possibility that he could have been guilty...but FOR GOD'S SAKE I WAS 11 AT THAT TIME!!!!!!!!!what did you want??that i reflect like an adult??my father's exactly of the same age as michael....MJ was in my dad's youth, not in mine...that's why i never was interested
    Faith, thank you for your support and encouragement!and most of all, thank you for understanding me. Some things do hurt, but they make me admire michael even more...i'm more willing to defend him...don't worry, i will not give up..thanks to people like you who are very kind, i can see that michael really brought the world together. i don't hate all those who wrote nasty comments. Yeah, sometimes despite everything i might get angry(i;m human;) but if there's one thing i've learned from michael's's that with love you can do anything:)))))))
    so now i want to take time to tell everybody here; mjhaters, mjfans who love me or hate me(lol)...that i love them all no matter what:D
    i really do...
    even if our opinions differ, they are only ideas…and we’re people…:))
    “Make love your only weapon to overcome any evil…”

    Answer:-Michael must be in great shocked , his kindness to children and their family who looks completely innocent... turn into complete devil and violence...

    anything, anything... anything for money, you'd lie for it, you'd die for it
    even sell my soul to the devil - Michael Jackson - Money (HIStory album 1994)
    Rarely will you ever find me wasting 5 points on you, but this I feel is important. You obviously have this weird notion that Michael Jackson was a child molester. I've answered many of your questions on this matter, providing numerous sources as proof to declare his innocence. Still skepticism remains, So would you be willing to buy Michael Jackson Conspiracy by Aphrodite Jones to clear the air once and for all? In case you are wondering, Aphrodite Jones often commented on the MJ trial for FOX News, and was one of the few who admitted to intentionally trying to place the guilty verdict of Michael.

    Haters, you can't say that proof doesn't exist, because it's everywhere. What say you?
    MJ ♥: Thank you very much!

    Cinzano Bianco: Sadly, I'm finding that out with some of the answers I'm getting.

    snoopie: Your answer was respectable. Have a great day as well, Snoops.

    Marvelous Matthew: haha Bet she thought twice about saying that again. It's like if they had actual proof to prove their claims, things would be different.

    endo: I couldn't disagree with you more. My life, at the moment, is clearing the name of Michael Jackson. He deserves it, and I will try my best to do it.
    izzy: Yeah, Michael truly was a gift from God. Thanks for the compliment!

    ♥♪R.I.P Michael Jackson <33 ♫: I couldn't have said it better myself!

    Wott Wott: Wrong! I do not think OJ Simpson was innocent. I love how people try to compare the two. They are incomparable. And, if you lived in a world where you were so famous, but also so sought after and envied, you would go off the "deep end" as well.

    Submarina: Agreed. Thanks.

    Eli ♫♪ ♥RIP MJ♥: Thank you for the compliment! I'd say we're doing a pretty good job, Don't ya think?
    mr danger: I love your answer because it is filled with, not facts, but assumptions. Your first fact says two things that I will very quickly dispel. You said, "Guys who were physically abused as children usually grow up to be abusive parents." The keyword there is USUALLY, not always, and CHILDREN (he was not accused of abusing his children). Your second fact is an assumption and not a proven fact at all. Your third fact is yet another assumption, as you have not conducted a survey with ALL ADULT MEN to make such a conclusion. Your fourth fact is my favorite. The COURT DOCUMENTS state that "the 1993 civil settlement was made by Mr. Jackson’s insurance company and was not within Mr. Jackson’s control… The settlement agreement was for global claims of negligence and the lawsuit was defended by Mr. Jackson’s insurance carrier. The insurance carrier negotiated and paid the settlement, over the protests of Mr. Jackson and his personal legal counsel.” Your facts? Not so much.
    ILoveYouMJJ<3'x: As always, I appreciate your compliments greatly! It is very true that the haters are equally obsessed with Michael, though they're too scared to admit it.
    mr danger: Okay, and everything you have listed are things we are required to do because the law says so. The law, however, does not say Michael Jackson could not allow children to sleep in his bed. Unless, of course, that was generally accepted among the "adult" society.
    endo: I respect your opinion, as it was given in good taste. Obviously we have differing opinions on the matter, but I stand by everything I have said. I broke down mr. danger's argument because I felt he was making assumptions, which he was. I will be the first to admit that Michael's waysof living his life was no where near conventional, but that doesn't make it criminally wrong. I'm sure he'd done things he wasn't exactly proud of (eg. showing his baby to the fans below, also known as the baby dangling), but molestation isn't one of them. As far as the drug use is concerned, there is much more to that story than is being told. Michael had some very serious injuries in his lifetime, thus having to use medicines to ease the pain. Did he abuse the drugs? Maybe, but the toxicology report has not come back yet. Also, the insurance company paid the Chandler family off, not because they thought Michael was guilty, but because it was cheaper to do so. Bringing the case to court...
    proved extremely costly and time consuming, considering the fact that Michael was in the middle of a major tour (Dangerous tour). You can research the topic and find out for yourself if you don't want to take my word for it. The information is everywhere, which is my primary reason for posting this question.
    idc: Your childish rant does nothing for your credibility. Just so you know, I don't base my opinions off of what I hear on the news or in the media. That is the primary reason why I research the topic on the internet. Also, the information that I have gathered are from people who are very knowledgeable of the Michael Jackson molestation cases. These people have either been in the courtroom during the trial, or gathered information from court documents and other legal documents. I am not able to access those court documents and legal documents, thus my reliance on others to do it for me. Finally, yes in my opinion Michael was/is innocent; however, I don't base his innocence off of just my opinion, but rather off of the many facts I have seen. Shut up? Yeah, that's what you'd love to happen, but it won't.
    endo: Thanks man. I appreciate you taking the time to give your opinion.

    idc: You are missing the whole point. These ARE facts. And, by the way, there was never proof to convict him to the crimes he were accused of. Those who worked for Michael who say opposite of what I say are the same workers who either stole from him, extorted money from him, was fired by him and had a bad taste in their mouths, and/or all of the above. That you can find in the 2005 trial transcripts.

    Annie's Not Ok: Agreed! No, Michael Jackson Conspiracy was released in 2007, so its fairly new. I bought mine at Barnes and Noble, so may want to check there. I also avoid books written about MJ, but this book is really interesting thus far. People complain about the $1.4 million spent by California on Michael's memorial, but Californians don't know that millions of dollars were spent by the prosecution trying to convict Michael, for which they had nothing on him. It's a good read, check it out.
    Rock N' Roll Junkie: You were the idiot that asked, so I answered your question. Let's not forget Junkie that the Beatles were a GROUP consisting of 4 members and 13 studio albums. They have sold well over a billion records, which is impressive. Now, let's take Michael Jackson. Michael Jackson, a lone person, has sold well over 750 million records with 10 studio albums, which will hit the billion mark in no time. He has the greatest selling album of all time, Thriller. He's given over $300 million to 39 or so charities, which he is the ONLY ONE TO DO SO. The list goes on, but I'm curious. Paul McCartney was a member of the Beatles, right? Does his accomplishments individually match Michael's? Does any of the other member's accomplishments individually match Michael's? No, that's what I thought. So really, Michael is the Greatest Entertainer (single) of All Time. And, let's not forget that he OWNS THE BEATLES CATALOG.
    உJoWanna: Thanks for the video! I love it! Of course, it was edited in such a way as to make Michael look like a freak, but I understand him. What Martin Bashir did to Michael was unfair and immoral. Michael trusted him and he took advantage of that. I'm reading Michael Jackson Conspiracy and Bashir literally didn't answer any questions about the documentary. Guilty much?
    உJoWanna: Absolutely! He looked like a complete moron!
    Rock N' Roll Junkie: Arguing with you is like continuously trying to fix a broken record. Go out on the street today where there's kids and say, "Hey kid, do you know who John Lennon is? Name an Elvis Presley record. Who's this guy [show a picture Michael Jackson]?" All of your arguments will be put to rest once you do so. Next, lets not forget that we live in an age where actual records are selling less and digital downloads are selling more, so do take that into account. You say you don't care, and yet you still try to argue your point, which by the way isn't going anywhere. Regardless, Lennon (no offense), Elvis nor his sideburns, and the Beatles can not hold a candle to Michael's original songs, dance, and style. Oh yeah before I forget, Michael Jackson owns both the Beatles catalog AND the Elvis catalog. Says much?

    Answer:-I'm not a king of pop hater and trust me if he did molest any kid he would of got caught...So he is not in my eyes...a guy that rich and famous couldn't get out of that...I know he was lawyer upped but nothing came out to prove it...i still can't believe he died
  • Question:-oh wow did you know 3 jurors regret aquiting michael jackson?
    excerpt:LOS ANGELES (AP) — A third juror in the Michael Jackson case who initially favored a guilty verdict weighed in after two others expressed second thoughts, saying she believes the entertainer is a child molester but joined in the verdict exonerating him because of reasonable doubt.
    Appearing on MSNBC on Tuesday, Juror Katarina Carls said she initially agreed with Eleanor Cook and Ray Hultman that Jackson was guilty, but decided she could not convict because of jury instructions that he must be acquitted if there was reasonable doubt. She said it was possible that Jackson's accuser was lying. "I kept asking myself, is there any slight possibility that this boy might lie at all? And my answer was yes," she said. Cook and Hultman said Monday as they began publicizing book deals that they believe Jackson molested his 15-year-old accuser and now regret finding him not guilty in the June verdict.

    Answer:-I did not know that. I hope and pray he is not hurting any children or teens at this time, or ever. I don't like him at all.
  • Question:-which of the following is an example of stratified sampling?
    Which of the following is an example of stratified sampling?


    (a) A sample of 351 people called a radio show to express their
    opinions about the verdict in the Michael Jackson trial.


    (b) In order to assess students' satisfaction with the food
    establishment on campus, the first 50 students that come out of the student center
    were interviewed.


    (c) A poll asked a random sample of 1,112 adults whether they
    believe that the use of marijuana for medical reasons should be legalized.


    (d) A health educator wanted to study the sleeping habits of the
    undergraduate students in her university. For her study, the researcher chose a
    simple random sample of size 150 from each of the classes (150 freshmen, 150
    sophomores, 150 juniors, and 150 seniors), for a total of 600 sampled students.


    (e) The human resources department of a large bank wanted
    to assess the job satisfaction of the bank's workers. The department chose four of
    the bank's branches at random, and used all of the workers in those four branches as
    the subjects for the study.

    please choose ONLY one.

    Answer:-Do your own homework dude!
  • Question:-Isn't it hypocritical of Michael Jackson fans to say that OJ Simpson is guilty? [Read details]?
    Many Michael Jackson fans are well informed on the trial that took place in 2005 and many of them will tell you that Michael Jackson was innocent of all charges and that he was found innocent in a court of law. Most of us have researched the trial and know that what the media had portrayed of it was extremely biased and slanted. But when a skeptic brings into the equation OJ Simpson's trial, many fans are quick to say "Michael and OJ are two different people. Michael is innocent and OJ was guilty."

    The thing that MJ fans get mad at skeptics for is their ignorance about the case, about the trial and the allegations. However, they are quick to jump to conclusions about OJ Simpson. Isn't it possible that OJ Simpson and Michael Jackson aren't as different as us MJ fans claim they are? How do we know without fully researching OJ's case that the right verdict was found or not?
    I'm not saying that Michael was guilty, I know enough about the allegations to know they were 110% false, what I am getting at is I don't, and I think that most MJ fan's don't know enough facts about OJ Simpson's trial to say he was guilty or innocent one way or another, and if we claim that Michael was found innocent in a court of law, then shouldn't we uphold that ideology and say that OJ was found innocent in a court of law as well?

    Answer:-Some fans are smart enough now to not be quick to judge. To know you MUST research to know the truth, and you are being ignorant if you judge without hearing the -whole- story.

    Then there the MJ fans that don't.

    I guess thats just how it is.

    Especially since I am pretty sure the MJ fanbase has grown a lot since his death.
    To say so, a bunch of my fellow highschoolers have chimed in (yeah..the same ones who would make fun of MJ fans before) and I know for sure these people could care less to take a minute of their time to research anything.

    EDIT: to fellow answers, I don't think she was getting at how OJ may have been more obviously guilty unlike how MJ wasn't guilty,(never looked into the OJ case), but how some MJ fans are being quick to judge, and you'd think the experience with the Michael case would prevent that.
  • Question:-Michael Jackson fans, do you think?
    The jury will come back with a verdict today? In the Doctor Murry trial.. Or do you think it might at least be this week?

    BQ: When the verdict comes in, do you think it will be a guilty verdict? ..Thanks

    Answer:-I don't think the jury will come back with a verdict today. I hope we'll know it this week because I can't wait to see that justice has finally been given for Michael, his family and us, his fans. (well, I hope)

    BQ: I think Murray is guilty so I hope it will be a guilty verdict.

    Edit: A verdict has been reached!
  • Question:-MB/MJ FAM: Is it True that Diane Diamond was?
    fired from Court TV in 2005 immediately following the 10 not guilty verdicts from Michael Jackson's molestation trial for false reporting?

    Answer:-Yes she was. I was not surprise when she got fired for her biases reporting. I am proud to say that I complained about her at the network web site many times during the trial. Diane Dimond is a disgrace to humankind and even more of a disgrace to journalism.
  • Question:-I always root for the defendant in the trial.... is this normal?
    I remember being so happy at the OJ "not guilty verdict" in the 90's and the late Michael Jackson in 2005. I always watch the OJ not guilty verdict, and always smile.

    Is this normal?


    Answer:-He was not a bad person at all, but he had serious problems and needed help.

    The jury in Michael Jackson's child abuse trial said there was simply "not enough" evidence for a guilty verdict.

    Law always use very appropriate terms and “not guilty” doesn’t necessarily mean “innocent” as this last word has NEVER been said by the jury. People who say Michael Jackson was innocent are therefore “ignorant” of the law means.

    Please just read the official police reports used in the trial before wondering if someone is innocent or not on personal basis or after reading a book.

    The police found in his private bedroom many hidden gay porn magazines with young boys (legal age) on them.

    Please read the official thousand pages of the process to know what happened to little kids in his houses.

    The Jury said there was NOT ENOUGH evidence for a guilty verdict, the Jury didn’t say there was NO evidence.

    He really was a great artist, nobody can deny that, but his private life was very different from what you see on tv or read in books.

No comments:

Post a Comment